There
are several products of Tea together with Cinnamon, Ginger, Peppermint,
Rosemary, Lemon Grass Jasmine, Vanilla etc in the Herbal Tea Market. We could
also see pure Herbal infusion such as Polpala, Belimal, Iramusu, Gotukola,
Karapincha, Chamomile etc. The research was carried out to develop natural
herbal tea by using belimal (Aegle
marmelos) blended with tea for the value added tea market segment as Belimal
is one of the most important herbs grown in Sri Lanka.
Belimal is the most famous herb used as a Herbal infusion (not mixed with tea)
for generations. The herb has its significant fragrance, a good and lasting
taste and promotes fresh breath. On the other hand, Tea is rich in
antioxidants, and herbs are
generally known to have lower antioxidant values than Tea (Camellia sinensis).
Therefore the Combination, of Belimal with Tea could be used as a major
strategy by Tea Exporters to capture the market ever changing international
markets as this product includes the natural qualities of Tea and medicinal
value of both Belimal and Tea.
The belimal flowers are dried and crushed in order to make belimal powder. Then
belimal powder is mixed with Black Tea or Green Tea, and a constant total
weight for each and every combination should be maintained. The
research was conducted according to Two Factor Factorial Design with three
factors at two levels as two experiments to the Black Tea and Green Tea. Both
experiments consisted with 4 treatment combinations. The Black Tea or Green Tea
blend with belimal powder according to the percentages (25% and 50%) while
changing brewing time (3 minute and 5 minute) in both experiments.
Data was collected through a standard sensory evaluation sheet. The sensory
evaluation was conducted by ranking method separately, where company Tea Tasters
evaluated color, strength, taste and aroma to check the overall quality in both
two experiments. MINITAB was used to analyze the data by using Kruskal
Wallis test and Conover- Inman method is used for select the
best treatment combination.
Crushing
Table 1:
Treatment combination for Experiment 1
Treatment
(Sample
Code)
|
Black
Tea
|
Belimal
Powder
|
Brewing
Time
|
Total
Weight
|
001
|
7.5g
|
2.5g
|
3
minute
|
10g
|
002
|
5.0g
|
5.0g
|
3
minute
|
10g
|
005
|
7.5g
|
2.5g
|
5
minute
|
10g
|
006
|
5.0g
|
5.0g
|
5
minute
|
10g
|
Table 2: Treatment combination for Experiment 2
Treatment
(Sample
Code)
|
Green
Tea
|
Belimal
Powder
|
Brewing
Time
|
Total
Weight
|
003
|
7.5g
|
2.5g
|
3
minute
|
10g
|
004
|
5.0g
|
5.0g
|
3
minute
|
10g
|
007
|
7.5g
|
2.5g
|
5
minute
|
10g
|
008
|
5.0g
|
5.0g
|
5
minute
|
10g
|
Null Hypothesis (H0) - There is no significant difference
of overall sensory quality between treatment combinations.
Alternative Hypothesis
(H1) - There is a
significant difference in overall sensory quality between treatment
combinations.
Decision Rule
Reject H0 if, Statistical test “H” value
(calculated value) > Critical Chi- square value at α = 0.05 or
Statistical test “P” value
< Critical α value (0.05)
Table 3: Results of Kruskal Wallis Test for
Experiment 1
Treatment N Median Ave Rank Z
1 7 10.500
11.1 -1.27
2 7 24.000
22.0 2.79
5 7 6.000
8.1 -2.36
6 7 19.500
16.8 0.85
Overall 28 14.5
H = 11.76 DF = 3
P = 0.008
H = 11.97 DF = 3
P = 0.007 (adjusted for ties)
Table 4: Results of Kruskal Wallis Test for
Experiment 2
Treatment N Median
Ave Rank Z
3 7 9.500
8.9 -2.07
4 7 21.500
17.4 1.09
7 7 21.500
19.9 2.02
8 7 9.500
11.7 -1.03
Overall 28 14.5
H = 7.95 DF = 3
P = 0.047
H = 8.09 DF = 3
P = 0.044 (adjusted for ties)
In both experiments
belimal powder percentage and brewing time was significant at P<0.05. There
is a significant different in overall quality between treatment combinations at
H>7.815.
According to Conover-Inman method, was selected
best treatment combination such as treatment combination 002 and 006 in
experiment 1 and treatment combination 004 and 007 in experiment 2.
R (crit.)
= t (N-k, α/2). {[N (N+1) ÷12][(N- 1- H) ÷ (N- k)]}1/2
[(1÷ ni )+ (1 ÷ nj)]1/2
= t (28 – 4, 2.5%) {[28 (28 + 1) ÷ 12][(28 – 1 – 8.09) ÷
(28 – 4)]}1/2 [(1÷ 7) (1÷ 7)]1/2
= 8.0319
Decision Rule
Treatment Combination is significantly
different from others (*) if,
Difference of Average Ranks >
Critical Conover-Inman value
Table 5: Differences of Average Ranks and
Indication with * marks in experiment 1
Treatment
|
005
|
001
|
006
|
001
|
3.0
|
||
006
|
8.7 *
|
5.7
|
|
002
|
13.9 *
|
8.2
*
|
5.2
|
Table 6: Differences of Average Ranks and
Indication with * marks in experiment 2
Treatment
|
003
|
008
|
004
|
008
|
2.8
|
||
004
|
8.5
*
|
5.7
|
|
007
|
11.0
*
|
8.2 *
|
2.5
|
Then
according to the cost analysis treatment combination 002 and 006 are similar
costs in experiment 1 and treatment combination 007 less expensive than
treatment combination 004 in experiment 2.
Table 4.15: Nutrient Test Results of Treatment
007 for 500g Sample
Test/Unit
|
Method
|
Results
|
Carbohydrate,
percent by mass
|
By
difference
|
64.6
|
Protein,
percent by mass
|
Pearson’s
Chemical Analysis of Food
|
6.0
|
Fat,
percent by mass
|
Pearson’s
Chemical Analysis of Food
|
Not detected
|
Fibre,
percent by mass
|
Pearson’s
Chemical Analysis of Food
|
11.4
|
Moisture,
percent by mass
|
Pearson’s
Chemical Analysis of Food
|
8.6
|
Sugar,
percent by mass
|
Pearson’s
Chemical Analysis of Food
|
Not detected
|
Energy,
Kcal 100g-1
|
By
calculation
|
282
|
Caffeine,
percent by mass
|
ISO
10727
|
2.4
|
The
results revealed that percentage of belimal powder and brewing time have some
considerable effect to the final product in the research project. According
to the sensory analysis and cost analysis, treatment combinations 002 and 006
are preferable for value added tea market as black tea blend with belimal and
treatment combination 007 is more useful for value added tea market as green
tea blend with belimal.
No comments:
Post a Comment